# bookorbit vs RustFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | RustFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 5 894 | 35 507 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 216 | +1 675 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit and RustFS score the same (74/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-rustfs