# bookorbit vs RemoteTerm for MeshCore

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | RemoteTerm for MeshCore |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #4 of 4 in Amateur Radio |
| GitHub stars | 5 902 ✓ | 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 224 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.17.1 · 26 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 74/100 against 45/100 for RemoteTerm for MeshCore, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for RemoteTerm for MeshCore.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; RemoteTerm for MeshCore needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 224 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [RemoteTerm for MeshCore](https://selfhost.directory/project/remote-terminal-for-meshcore) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/remote-terminal-for-meshcore.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-remote-terminal-for-meshcore