# bookorbit vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 ✓ | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 256 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 73/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-qm-music