# bookorbit vs PVE-UPS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | PVE-UPS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #20 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 5 908 ✓ | 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 230 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.3.0 · 10 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 74/100 against 51/100 for PVE-UPS, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PVE-UPS.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; PVE-UPS needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 230 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [PVE-UPS](https://selfhost.directory/project/pve-ups) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pve-ups.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-pve-ups