# bookorbit vs Pulse

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 882 | 6 973 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 252 ✓ | +232 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 43 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 73/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 23 for bookorbit.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 252 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-pulse