# bookorbit vs Pterodactyl

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | Pterodactyl |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #5 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 5 894 | 9 438 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 264 ✓ | +184 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Pterodactyl scores 75/100 against 73/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Pterodactyl.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Pterodactyl needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 264 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [Pterodactyl](https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pterodactyl.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-pterodactyl