# bookorbit vs Postal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | Postal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #3 of 16 in Mail Server |
| GitHub stars | 5 868 | 16 898 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 238 ✓ | +74 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.3.7 · 3 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 73/100 against 72/100 for Postal, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Postal.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Postal needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 238 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [Postal](https://selfhost.directory/project/postal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/postal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-postal