# bookorbit vs penpot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 5 889 | 61 801 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 259 | +1 489 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Clojure |

## Which one should you pick?

penpot scores 84/100 against 73/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-penpot