# bookorbit vs OtoDock

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | OtoDock |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #104 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 902 ✓ | 195 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 224 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.9.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 74/100 against 49/100 for OtoDock, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OtoDock.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; OtoDock needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 224 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [OtoDock](https://selfhost.directory/project/oto-dock) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/oto-dock.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-oto-dock