# bookorbit vs OpenTTD

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | OpenTTD |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 5 894 | 8 434 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 264 ✓ | +137 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 15.3 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit and OpenTTD score the same (73/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for OpenTTD.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; OpenTTD needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 264 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [OpenTTD](https://selfhost.directory/project/openttd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openttd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-openttd