# bookorbit vs opencut

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | opencut |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #2 of 12 in Video |
| GitHub stars | 5 899 | 96 679 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 221 | +6 058 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

opencut scores 75/100 against 74/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for opencut.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; opencut needs more configuration.

opencut is growing faster right now (+6 058 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [opencut](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-opencut