# bookorbit vs Opencast

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | Opencast |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #38 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 901 ✓ | 509 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 223 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | 19.10 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | ECL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 74/100 against 57/100 for Opencast, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Opencast.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Opencast needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 223 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [Opencast](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencast) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencast.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-opencast