# bookorbit vs ontime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | ontime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #3 of 11 in Event Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 902 ✓ | 970 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 224 ✓ | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 74/100 against 60/100 for ontime, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for ontime.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; ontime needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 224 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [ontime](https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-ontime