# bookorbit vs Nomad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | Nomad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 5 877 | 17 047 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 247 ✓ | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Nomad scores 76/100 against 73/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for Nomad.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 247 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [Nomad](https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nomad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-nomad