# bookorbit vs NodeLink

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | NodeLink |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #7 of 14 in Audio Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 5 899 ✓ | 162 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 221 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.9.0 · 14 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 74/100 against 50/100 for NodeLink, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for NodeLink.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; NodeLink needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 221 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [NodeLink](https://selfhost.directory/project/nodelink) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nodelink.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-nodelink