# bookorbit vs namer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | namer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #19 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 889 ✓ | 332 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 259 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.19.20 · 25 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 73/100 against 49/100 for namer, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for namer.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; namer needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 259 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [namer](https://selfhost.directory/project/namer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/namer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-namer