# bookorbit vs multica

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | multica |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #10 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 5 901 | 54 221 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 223 | +2 913 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 87 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

multica scores 84/100 against 74/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.

multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 23 for bookorbit.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; multica needs more configuration.

multica is growing faster right now (+2 913 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [multica](https://selfhost.directory/project/multica) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/multica.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-multica