# bookorbit vs MeshCentral

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | MeshCentral |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #2 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 5 876 | 7 529 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 246 ✓ | +251 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 16 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.3.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

MeshCentral scores 74/100 against 73/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for MeshCentral.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 246 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [MeshCentral](https://selfhost.directory/project/meshcentral) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/meshcentral.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-meshcentral