# bookorbit vs MCSManager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | MCSManager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 5 899 ✓ | 5 004 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 221 ✓ | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 20 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

bookorbit scores 74/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for MCSManager.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 221 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [MCSManager](https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-mcsmanager