# bookorbit vs Infisical

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | Infisical |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 908 | 30 132 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 230 ✓ | +716 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 79 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Infisical scores 78/100 against 74/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.

Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 23 for bookorbit.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [Infisical](https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-infisical