# bookorbit vs Harbor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bookorbit | Harbor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 5 882 | 29 635 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 252 ✓ | +191 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Harbor scores 80/100 against 73/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.

bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Harbor.

If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Harbor needs more configuration.

bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 252 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bookorbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bookorbit.md)
- [Harbor](https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bookorbit-vs-harbor