# bonob vs copyparty

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bonob | copyparty |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #38 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 341 | 47 163 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +390 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.15.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 48/100 for bonob, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for bonob.

If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; bonob needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+390 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bonob](https://selfhost.directory/project/bonob) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bonob.md)
- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bonob-vs-copyparty