# BOINC vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BOINC | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Distributed Computing | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 2 495 | 93 082 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 | +58 141 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | client_release/8.2/8.2.15 · 15 Jun 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 62/100 for BOINC, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for BOINC.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; BOINC needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 141 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BOINC](https://selfhost.directory/project/boinc) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/boinc.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/boinc-vs-omnivoice-studio