# blindsend vs copyparty

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | blindsend | copyparty |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #25 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #1 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 185 | 47 168 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +395 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | — | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 38/100 for blindsend, so it is the safer default.

copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for blindsend.

If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; blindsend needs more configuration.

copyparty is growing faster right now (+395 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [blindsend](https://selfhost.directory/project/blindsend) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/blindsend.md)
- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/blindsend-vs-copyparty