# BLE Monitor vs Redis

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BLE Monitor | Redis |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Integration | #1 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 2 251 | 77 145 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +691 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 36 ✓ |
| Latest release | 14.4.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | 8.10.3 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Redis scores 86/100 against 60/100 for BLE Monitor, so it is the safer default.

Redis ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for BLE Monitor.

If you want the quickest setup, BLE Monitor is easier to run; Redis needs more configuration.

Redis is growing faster right now (+691 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BLE Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/ble-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ble-monitor.md)
- [Redis](https://selfhost.directory/project/redis) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/redis.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ble-monitor-vs-redis