# BLE Monitor vs n8n

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BLE Monitor | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Integration | #1 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 2 251 | 208 889 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +3 080 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 205 ✓ |
| Latest release | 14.4.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | n8n@3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

n8n scores 92/100 against 60/100 for BLE Monitor, so it is the safer default.

n8n ships more often: 205 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for BLE Monitor.

If you want the quickest setup, BLE Monitor is easier to run; n8n needs more configuration.

n8n is growing faster right now (+3 080 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BLE Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/ble-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ble-monitor.md)
- [n8n](https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ble-monitor-vs-n8n