# BLE Monitor vs metamcp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BLE Monitor | metamcp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Integration | #10 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 2 251 | 2 734 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +48 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | 14.4.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

metamcp scores 61/100 against 60/100 for BLE Monitor, so it is the safer default.

BLE Monitor ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for metamcp.

If you want the quickest setup, BLE Monitor is easier to run; metamcp needs more configuration.

metamcp is growing faster right now (+48 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BLE Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/ble-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ble-monitor.md)
- [metamcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ble-monitor-vs-metamcp