# BLE Monitor vs HyperSwitch

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BLE Monitor | HyperSwitch |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Integration | #2 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 2 251 | 45 506 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +1 676 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | 14.4.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 60/100 for BLE Monitor, so it is the safer default.

BLE Monitor ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.

If you want the quickest setup, BLE Monitor is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.

HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 676 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BLE Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/ble-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ble-monitor.md)
- [HyperSwitch](https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ble-monitor-vs-hyperswitch