# BLE Monitor vs frankframework

> Two self-hosted [Integration projects](https://selfhost.directory/integration), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | BLE Monitor | frankframework |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Integration | #3 of 3 in Integration |
| GitHub stars | 2 251 ✓ | 168 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | 14.4.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v10.2.1 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

BLE Monitor scores 60/100 against 50/100 for frankframework, so it is the safer default.

BLE Monitor ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for frankframework.

If you want the quickest setup, BLE Monitor is easier to run; frankframework needs more configuration.

BLE Monitor is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [BLE Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/ble-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ble-monitor.md)
- [frankframework](https://selfhost.directory/project/frankframework) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/frankframework.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ble-monitor-vs-frankframework