Blackbox exportervsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Blackbox exporter | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 5 922 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.29.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Blackbox exporter scores 70/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Blackbox exporter.
If you want the quickest setup, Blackbox exporter is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Blackbox exporter is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
Blackbox exporter details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Blackbox exporter, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with