Blackbox exportervsWebterminal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Blackbox exporter | Webterminal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #19 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 5 923 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.29.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Blackbox exporter scores 70/100 against 56/100 for Webterminal, so it is the safer default.
Blackbox exporter ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Webterminal.
If you want the quickest setup, Blackbox exporter is easier to run; Webterminal needs more configuration.
Blackbox exporter is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).
Blackbox exporter details →Webterminal details →
Swap a project
Keep Blackbox exporter, compare it with
Keep Webterminal, compare it with