BitwardenvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bitwarden | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in Password Managers | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 20 507 | 8 653 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +308 | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 1 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Bitwarden scores 76/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
Bitwarden ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Bitwarden needs more configuration.
Bitwarden details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep Bitwarden, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with