# Bitwarden vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Bitwarden | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in Password Managers | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 20 508 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +309 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Bitwarden scores 76/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Bitwarden ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

Bitwarden is growing faster right now (+309 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Bitwarden](https://selfhost.directory/project/bitwarden) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bitwarden.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bitwarden-vs-windows-arm