BitwardenvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bitwarden | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in Password Managers | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 20 508 | 17 185 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +309 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Bitwarden scores 76/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
Bitwarden ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Bitwarden needs more configuration.
Bitwarden is growing faster right now (+309 stars in 30 days).
Bitwarden details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep Bitwarden, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with