# Bitwarden vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Bitwarden | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in Password Managers | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 20 510 ✓ | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +311 ✓ | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Bitwarden scores 76/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Bitwarden ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

Bitwarden is growing faster right now (+311 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Bitwarden](https://selfhost.directory/project/bitwarden) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bitwarden.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bitwarden-vs-tube-archivist