bitmagnetvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bitmagnet | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Torrent | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 4 438 | 17 185 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.10.1 · 21 May 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 59/100 for bitmagnet, so it is the safer default.
bitmagnet ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; bitmagnet needs more configuration.
bitmagnet is growing faster right now (+67 stars in 30 days).
bitmagnet details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep bitmagnet, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with