bitmagnetvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bitmagnet | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Torrent | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 4 438 | 47 726 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 | +19 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.10.1 · 21 May 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 59/100 for bitmagnet, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for bitmagnet.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; bitmagnet needs more configuration.
bitmagnet is growing faster right now (+67 stars in 30 days).
bitmagnet details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep bitmagnet, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with