# bitmagnet vs ruTorrent

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | bitmagnet | ruTorrent |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 62/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Torrent | #4 of 12 in Bittorrent |
| GitHub stars | 4 439 ✓ | 2 188 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +68 ✓ | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.10.1 · 21 May 2026 | v5.3.19 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

ruTorrent scores 62/100 against 59/100 for bitmagnet, so it is the safer default.

ruTorrent ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for bitmagnet.

If you want the quickest setup, bitmagnet is easier to run; ruTorrent needs more configuration.

bitmagnet is growing faster right now (+68 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [bitmagnet](https://selfhost.directory/project/bitmagnet) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bitmagnet.md)
- [ruTorrent](https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bitmagnet-vs-rutorrent