# Bitfocus Companion vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Bitfocus Companion | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 2 344 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 ✓ | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

Bitfocus Companion scores 68/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.

Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.

If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; Bitfocus Companion needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Bitfocus Companion](https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bitfocus-companion-vs-zero-k