Bitfocus CompanionvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bitfocus Companion | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 2 344 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 68/100 for Bitfocus Companion, so it is the safer default.
Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Bitfocus Companion is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Zammad is growing faster right now (+103 stars in 30 days).
Bitfocus Companion details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Bitfocus Companion, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with