Bitfocus Companionvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bitfocus Companion | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 345 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 3 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Bitfocus Companion scores 67/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, Bitfocus Companion is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
Bitfocus Companion is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).
Bitfocus Companion details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep Bitfocus Companion, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with