# Bitfocus Companion vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Bitfocus Companion | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 344 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 67/100 for Bitfocus Companion, so it is the safer default.

Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Bitfocus Companion needs more configuration.

Bitfocus Companion is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Bitfocus Companion](https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bitfocus-companion-vs-upptime