Bitfocus CompanionvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bitfocus Companion | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 344 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 67/100 for Bitfocus Companion, so it is the safer default.
Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Bitfocus Companion needs more configuration.
Bitfocus Companion is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).
Bitfocus Companion details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep Bitfocus Companion, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with