# Bitfocus Companion vs SnapOtter

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Bitfocus Companion | SnapOtter |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #3 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 2 345 | 2 870 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +137 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.2.0 · 29 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Bitfocus Companion scores 68/100 against 66/100 for SnapOtter, so it is the safer default.

Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SnapOtter.

If you want the quickest setup, SnapOtter is easier to run; Bitfocus Companion needs more configuration.

SnapOtter is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Bitfocus Companion](https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion.md)
- [SnapOtter](https://selfhost.directory/project/snapotter) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/snapotter.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bitfocus-companion-vs-snapotter