Bitfocus CompanionvsApache SkyWalking
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bitfocus Companion | Apache SkyWalking | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 344 | 24 977 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 3 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 67/100 for Bitfocus Companion, so it is the safer default.
Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache SkyWalking.
If you want the quickest setup, Bitfocus Companion is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
Bitfocus Companion is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).
Bitfocus Companion details →Apache SkyWalking details →
Swap a project
Keep Bitfocus Companion, compare it with
Keep Apache SkyWalking, compare it with