Bitfocus CompanionvsShields
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bitfocus Companion | Shields | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #6 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 2 345 | 27 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +129 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Shields scores 80/100 against 68/100 for Bitfocus Companion, so it is the safer default.
Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shields.
If you want the quickest setup, Shields is easier to run; Bitfocus Companion needs more configuration.
Shields is growing faster right now (+129 stars in 30 days).
Bitfocus Companion details →Shields details →
Swap a project
Keep Bitfocus Companion, compare it with
Keep Shields, compare it with