# Bitfocus Companion vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Bitfocus Companion | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 2 344 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Bitfocus Companion scores 67/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

Bitfocus Companion is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Bitfocus Companion](https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bitfocus-companion-vs-scada-lts