Bitfocus CompanionvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bitfocus Companion | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 345 | 45 002 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +1 629 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 34 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 68/100 for Bitfocus Companion, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for Bitfocus Companion.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
Bitfocus Companion details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep Bitfocus Companion, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with