Bitfocus Companionvsopenwhisk
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bitfocus Companion | openwhisk | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #2 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 2 345 | 6 803 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Scala |
Which one should you pick?
Bitfocus Companion scores 68/100 against 67/100 for openwhisk, so it is the safer default.
Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openwhisk.
If you want the quickest setup, Bitfocus Companion is easier to run; openwhisk needs more configuration.
Bitfocus Companion is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).
Bitfocus Companion details →openwhisk details →
Swap a project
Keep Bitfocus Companion, compare it with
Keep openwhisk, compare it with