# Bitfocus Companion vs MQTTX Web

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Bitfocus Companion | MQTTX Web |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #3 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 2 345 | 5 086 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 ✓ | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Bitfocus Companion scores 68/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.

Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MQTTX Web.

If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; Bitfocus Companion needs more configuration.

Bitfocus Companion is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Bitfocus Companion](https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/bitfocus-companion.md)
- [MQTTX Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/bitfocus-companion-vs-mqttx-web